Much was made about the recent cover story by Rolling Stone magazine on Jahar, the Boston Bomber. There was public outrage from just about everyone, because of the 'rock star' cover photo. Social and mainstream media was abuzz over the controversy and like that it was over. The real reason the outrage ended so abruptly was because when viewing the cover in reality (not via cell or computer), the photo was nothing more than a grainy reissued photo seen in many magazine and newspapers previously. I didn't find fault for the petty reasons others did, feeling the victims should have been on the cover, because i thought that would have been true exploitation. I was bothered because it gives a voice, maybe even a motive to others, who might want to don the cover and receive their 15 minutes. The real issue(s) should have been with the article. The article is basically two parts. The beginning, which makes Jahar out to be the greatest guy...