Skip to main content

Circumstance Does Not Create Loyalty

I recently watched a Korean film titled Friend. It was about four boys who grew up together and despite going in separate directions with their choices, they are often reconnected by chance or circumstance. The film is a gangster film, but the heart of it is really an examination of the bonds formed by circumstance versus loyalty. What I took away from it is that circumstance or location does not necessarily equate to loyalty. Loyalty is a choice and one that can change depending on new circumstances or events. Does one's loyalty to his friends change when distance separates them? That is up to them; both of them. Does loyalty change when the opportunity arises, even if the opportunity means gain at the expense of loyalty? Again, this is a choice. Does the group dynamic change for all based on the decision of one? The simple answer is yes, but that is not to say that there might not be a member whose loyalty is unwavering, even if he supports both affected parties differently. Group dynamics is a tricky thing and this movie proves it. What it also proves is that even when greed corrupts loyalty, it cannot change the past. The past, and the bonds formed because of it, can never be changed, even if those bonds are shattered.

While the movie was very good, it was not great. I have thought about it often over the past two days and I think its impact will linger much longer. Possibly, although not immediately, I will revisit this film. I will watch it hopefully in a different place, surrounded by different constants in my life, and I will look back on the bonds I've created with some, those who I still value and who still value me, and those which have been broken, both through fault, lack of effort, and simply by circumstance. Some may call the last laziness. When one chooses not to change, it is a choice, but when one's change is simply location, both parties have to make a choice. I fault no one, even if I forget this often. For it is I who left, and I carried the burden of continuing to hold these bonds together. I made a choice, as did they, but it was and always will be mine first. The only pain comes from knowing, I am still loyal to them, I simply choose not to show it out of fear. Fear it will not be reciprocated, simply because people correlate distance with the burden of time, also known as being busy. For some, this happened long before I moved and I often try to remind myself of this fact, as not to lay the burden of these broken bonds all on myself. I look at my own family and realize we're all the same and it takes special people to continue what was built when the pieces aren't present. That takes strength and with most, I've been as weak as them; even weaker. I thank others for having the strength, because it gives me strength. That strength is loyalty and it is not nearly as common as some might think.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

White Privilege

This was a post I wrote on Facebook after surprisingly not seeing any moaning about the Documentary by Jose Antonio Vargas, titled White People Dayyum! I just scrolled my timeline and not a single white person got their feelings hurt by White People. I unfortunately haven't seen it, but the number of fake accounts that popped up on twitter, tells me it was a damn good show. Here's the thing. If someone of color aka non-white says "White Privilege," are you offended? If you said yes, then you are exhibiting white privilege. It has nothing to do with how hard you work or study, how you stayed out of trouble, because here's the thing, that is entirely the point. Somewhere out there, there are 100 Black, Spanish, Native American, Arab, Asian, who worked and studied as hard as you and never got in trouble, but they don't have what you "earned" or achieved. Stop looking at the one person you know who isn't white that achieved as your benchmark. Loo...

Quickie Review - Finding Vivian Maier

While I thoroughly enjoyed the film, especially the first 15-20 minutes, I was a little bothered by the way the film played out. The interviews with the clearly disturbed brother, sister and the mother, who obviously, was in for a cut, didn't need to be in the film. Then the woman who suggested abuse, yet seemed to have her life defined by Maier, as she tried to muster every ounce of emotion and fake guilt. Her friend, more than happy to be party of the charade. People who talk about abuse for the first time, usually don't do so on camera. The fact these scenes were so prominent, shows that they felt wronged that they were not rewarded. Maloof on the other hand, seems to disappear from the documentary during this part, almost hiding away from the fact, he went from complete praise, to even making money off of her, to destroying her personal legacy. He almost mentions the family of boys taking care of her rent, as an afterthought. Her burial spot, never shown, yet a video of her...

If You Listen To One Speech - Lana Wachowski

http://www.rollingstone.com/movies/videos/lana-wachowski-opens-up-about-difficult-past-and-attempted-suicide-20121024 Today I saw a link to a video for a speech by Lana Wachowski.  The last name rung a bell, but I could't put my finger on it. Lana, used to be Larry, one of the writer, director, producers of the Matrix trilogy, V for Vendetta and the upcoming Cloud Atlas.  Lana is transgendered and has "come out" as a woman.  She was being honored by the Human Rights Campaign. I didn't know what to expect when this broad woman with crazy hair and a raspy voice began to speak.  She began with the usual pleasantries and told of her hair dresser. She then tells of her desire to be a quiet person and how hard the success of the Matrix movies made this.  The first ten minutes is telling of how she's not quite ready to be this spokesperson.  Then she speaks about the new movie Cloud Atlas and reveals the heart of the movie and this speech. She states,"The resp...