Skip to main content

Things I Don't Have An Answer For After This Week - Some That Know The Truth Will Find This Funny

Sorry, I had to do it.  You guys know me, I'm an open book.  Since Tuesday or Wednesday or whatever day it took place, the feedback I've been getting (remember, I'm blocked, I can't "stalk") has been hilarious. The people who have jumped on the bash Hopper bandwagon are a collection of people I wouldn't piss on in a fire.  And the one's who have made comments about this person have done so privately and without any contempt.  They truly feel sorry for this sad person who obviously got so much more out of our debates than I did.  That being said, I'll miss the banter, when it was kept on topic, but this person always made it personal, then ran screaming and crying when the personal attacks were rebutted. Despite his religious claims of holding no anger in his heart, anyone who read his posts, especially his comments on web pages, knows he is filled with hate and rage.  I on the other hand, do not believe in God, do not believe in this internal goodness in all and I'm sitting back loving the fact that this act (of his) has left him so disoriented.  As he was apt to do, he would repeat my pleas to him, thinking he was being clever, but I mean it when I hope life turns for him and he can find that happiness he's obviously not getting from the places most of us turn.  I sincerely mean that, but hey, it's me, so I'm going to have fun with this while I can.  Sorry. If anyone views this as petty...you don't have to read it, but just realize all my comments, my statements and my (haha) "threats" were reactions, not actions.

If someone is proven wrong by the same person over and over, with empirical, historical, scientific and mathematical data, does it make them correct if they one of their best friends "likes" it on Facebook.

If someone threatens you and you ignore them, but then when you tell someone else who is friends with the one who did the threatening, is that a threat?

If someone unfriends you on Facebook, then bashes you ten seconds later, but adds the comment "I heard he's been slandering me" does that instantly make that person classy?

If the person who bad mouths you gets high praise from people who are addicted to cocaine, who can't spell and who are part of religious cults, does that mean their words hold more weight than say those who are on your side, who choose the high road and don't comment or like?

If someone whose occupation relies on the ability to do math properly, but can't understand basic mathematical data that you supply them during a debate, is it wrong that you choose not to refer your friends to them for business?

If someones religious beliefs contradict the meanings in their religious books, yet they preach about your ignorance, who is the one who is ignorant?

If someone says they only stayed friends with you because they believed you were suicidal and then they unfriend you, does that mean they think you are healed?

If someone tells you how miserable you are and how happy they are, why are they the ones not smiling in pictures with their families during wonderful moments, yet I smile even in times of stress?

If someone tells you the only reason you debate people is to boost your ego, yet they are the one that starts the debate, is that a riddle or a conundrum?

If someone says all you write is lies, then why would they bother with you for so long?

If someone claims to have an IQ of 130, yet doesn't know the basic concept of the argument THEY brought up, would you believe that person?

If the person who unfriended you writes things with such malice and cheers on those in agreement, but you speak about it with laughter and sarcasm, who really lost out on the "friendship?"

If someone likes the Tony Romo and the Dallas Cowboys, shouldn't we just feel sorry for them and accept that there is something wrong with them?


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

White Privilege

This was a post I wrote on Facebook after surprisingly not seeing any moaning about the Documentary by Jose Antonio Vargas, titled White People Dayyum! I just scrolled my timeline and not a single white person got their feelings hurt by White People. I unfortunately haven't seen it, but the number of fake accounts that popped up on twitter, tells me it was a damn good show. Here's the thing. If someone of color aka non-white says "White Privilege," are you offended? If you said yes, then you are exhibiting white privilege. It has nothing to do with how hard you work or study, how you stayed out of trouble, because here's the thing, that is entirely the point. Somewhere out there, there are 100 Black, Spanish, Native American, Arab, Asian, who worked and studied as hard as you and never got in trouble, but they don't have what you "earned" or achieved. Stop looking at the one person you know who isn't white that achieved as your benchmark. Loo

11 Rules of Life - Bill Gates?

I read this on Facebook this morning.  A friend had posted it and said that every child should have to receive this. I of course read it and started to think.  I immediately wondered who really wrote this, as I rarely see things like this attributed to the proper person.  I immediately found it was written by Conservative Charles J. Sykes when he wrote a book about how America is dumbing down our youth.  I read it twice and started to wonder how true it was.  Below is a link to the actual picture I saw. So let's look at each of the rules and analyze them. Rule 1: Life is not fair — get used to it! - Life is not fair in that we are not all afforded the same opportunities based on race, creed, color, socio-economic background, but in general, those who are afforded the same opportunities to succeed are very often rewarded for their individual efforts.  Sure there may be underlying circumstances, but hard work is proven to pay more often than not and those who strive for succ

Quickie Review - Finding Vivian Maier

While I thoroughly enjoyed the film, especially the first 15-20 minutes, I was a little bothered by the way the film played out. The interviews with the clearly disturbed brother, sister and the mother, who obviously, was in for a cut, didn't need to be in the film. Then the woman who suggested abuse, yet seemed to have her life defined by Maier, as she tried to muster every ounce of emotion and fake guilt. Her friend, more than happy to be party of the charade. People who talk about abuse for the first time, usually don't do so on camera. The fact these scenes were so prominent, shows that they felt wronged that they were not rewarded. Maloof on the other hand, seems to disappear from the documentary during this part, almost hiding away from the fact, he went from complete praise, to even making money off of her, to destroying her personal legacy. He almost mentions the family of boys taking care of her rent, as an afterthought. Her burial spot, never shown, yet a video of her